The Nearly Doners
4 minute read
Most professionals don’t struggle to start or even to progress — they struggle to finish.
Projects stall at 95%, the final draft lingers unsent, the presentation slides sit untouched a day longer than they should.
Psychologically, that last five percent is where motivation fades, fear creeps in, and mental energy gets rationed.
TL:DR
The five factors that drive the “nearly done” effect are:
- Avoidance: Finishing exposes your work to judgment, so your brain protects you by stalling.
- Perfectionism: Fear of imperfection keeps you polishing instead of shipping.
- Energy Economy: The last steps cost more mental energy than they seem worth.
- Motivation Dip: When novelty fades, so does drive — boredom takes over.
- Planning Blind Spots: You misjudge what “done” actually requires and lose momentum.
The fix isn’t more time or willpower — it’s self-intelligence.
When you understand how your mind reacts to fear, fatigue, and friction, you
can catch those patterns before they derail you. That’s what MeQ™ Self-Intelligence is all about: the awareness to recognize your own mental
roadblocks and the skill to finish what matters, completely.
1. The Comfort of Avoidance
Finishing brings exposure. Once something is complete, it’s open to judgment, feedback, and potential failure, all of which activate the brain’s threat response. Avoidance becomes a short-term coping strategy that feels like control: a way to postpone uncertainty and maintain a fragile sense of safety.
Research in organizational psychology links this to affective avoidance: people delay tasks not because they’re lazy, but because they’re regulating emotion. The irony, of course, is that avoidance preserves stress rather than relieves it. The task remains unfinished, and cognitive tension builds in the background.
2. Perfectionism in Disguise
Perfectionism often masquerades as diligence, but it’s rooted in fear of inadequacy. High achievers are prone to over-striving: they chase "perfect" outcomes to pre-empt criticism or self-doubt.
Studies show that maladaptive perfectionism predicts reduced output precisely because it promotes rumination and over-correction. The internal logic goes something like this: If I keep improving it, no one can find fault. But the reality is that endless refinement becomes avoidance by another name: progress without closure.
3. The Energy Economy
Cognitive resources are limited. As days fill with competing demands, the brain starts triaging — deciding, often unconsciously, which efforts are probably going to yield the highest return. The last 5% of any project tends to offer much novelty or immediate reward but also needs a disproportionate amount of effort. From a cost-benefit standpoint, it’s the least efficient use of energy.
Conservation of Resources theory describes this as psychological resource management. When people feel drained or overextended, they unconsciously conserve effort to prevent burnout. The result? Work that’s “okay for now,” but not quite done.
4. The Motivation Dip
Early-stage enthusiasm can carry a project far, but novelty has a short half-life. As engagement drops, so does follow-through. Boredom isn’t trivial because it’s a motivational signal that the brain is no longer receiving enough stimulation to stay focused.
Research consistently connects workplace boredom to procrastination and disengagement. The closer a task gets to completion, the more routine it becomes. Without intrinsic interest or external accountability, even highly capable professionals stall out before the finish line.
5. Planning Blind Spots
Finishing requires clarity, not just on what to do, but on what “done” actually means. Many people underestimate how complex final steps may be and assume they’ll take less time or energy than they often do. When reality doesn’t match expectation, motivation collapses.
Psychologists call this the planning fallacy: a cognitive bias that leads us to overestimate efficiency and underestimate possible obstacles. For solo practitioners or professionals without structural deadlines, this bias is amplified by autonomy. You have freedom without friction. No one’s waiting. No one’s pushing. The gap between “almost” and “done” quietly widens.
Finishing brings exposure. Once something is complete, it’s open to judgment, feedback, and potential failure, all of which activate the brain’s threat response. Avoidance becomes a short-term coping strategy that feels like control: a way to postpone uncertainty and maintain a fragile sense of safety.
Research in organizational psychology links this to affective avoidance: people delay tasks not because they’re lazy, but because they’re regulating emotion. The irony, of course, is that avoidance preserves stress rather than relieves it. The task remains unfinished, and cognitive tension builds in the background.
2. Perfectionism in Disguise
Perfectionism often masquerades as diligence, but it’s rooted in fear of inadequacy. High achievers are prone to over-striving: they chase "perfect" outcomes to pre-empt criticism or self-doubt.
Studies show that maladaptive perfectionism predicts reduced output precisely because it promotes rumination and over-correction. The internal logic goes something like this: If I keep improving it, no one can find fault. But the reality is that endless refinement becomes avoidance by another name: progress without closure.
3. The Energy Economy
Cognitive resources are limited. As days fill with competing demands, the brain starts triaging — deciding, often unconsciously, which efforts are probably going to yield the highest return. The last 5% of any project tends to offer much novelty or immediate reward but also needs a disproportionate amount of effort. From a cost-benefit standpoint, it’s the least efficient use of energy.
Conservation of Resources theory describes this as psychological resource management. When people feel drained or overextended, they unconsciously conserve effort to prevent burnout. The result? Work that’s “okay for now,” but not quite done.
4. The Motivation Dip
Early-stage enthusiasm can carry a project far, but novelty has a short half-life. As engagement drops, so does follow-through. Boredom isn’t trivial because it’s a motivational signal that the brain is no longer receiving enough stimulation to stay focused.
Research consistently connects workplace boredom to procrastination and disengagement. The closer a task gets to completion, the more routine it becomes. Without intrinsic interest or external accountability, even highly capable professionals stall out before the finish line.
5. Planning Blind Spots
Finishing requires clarity, not just on what to do, but on what “done” actually means. Many people underestimate how complex final steps may be and assume they’ll take less time or energy than they often do. When reality doesn’t match expectation, motivation collapses.
Psychologists call this the planning fallacy: a cognitive bias that leads us to overestimate efficiency and underestimate possible obstacles. For solo practitioners or professionals without structural deadlines, this bias is amplified by autonomy. You have freedom without friction. No one’s waiting. No one’s pushing. The gap between “almost” and “done” quietly widens.
The Real Takeaway
At its core, finishing is an act of self-intelligence.
It’s not about discipline in the traditional sense but rather it’s about
understanding your own psychological patterns well enough to manage them. MeQ
Self-Intelligence is that skill.
As you develop your MeQ, you start to see avoidance for what it is: a form of emotional self-protection. You recognize perfectionism not as a good thing, but as a signal that fear is driving the bus. You notice when your mental energy is dropping before your performance does.
The result is control through awareness, not willpower (which isn’t always present anyway). You can pause and ask, “What’s really happening here?” and then respond with intention rather than instinct. That’s what separates professionals who repeatedly stop at 95% from those who consistently close the loop, mentally and literally.
Because the truth is, it’s rarely about time or talent. It’s about knowing your own mind well enough to get out of your own way.
As you develop your MeQ, you start to see avoidance for what it is: a form of emotional self-protection. You recognize perfectionism not as a good thing, but as a signal that fear is driving the bus. You notice when your mental energy is dropping before your performance does.
The result is control through awareness, not willpower (which isn’t always present anyway). You can pause and ask, “What’s really happening here?” and then respond with intention rather than instinct. That’s what separates professionals who repeatedly stop at 95% from those who consistently close the loop, mentally and literally.
Because the truth is, it’s rarely about time or talent. It’s about knowing your own mind well enough to get out of your own way.
The MeQ™ Connection
Stopping at 95% isn’t a sign of weakness; it’s the predictable result of how motivation, emotion, and energy interact under pressure. Completion demands both self-awareness and structure. It means being able to recognize when avoidance, perfectionism, or fatigue are taking the wheel, and countering them with clear boundaries, accountability, and recovery time.
Finishing is a skill. It requires the discipline to tolerate discomfort, the courage to declare something “good enough,” and the psychological insight to manage your own energy economy.
Finishing is a skill. It requires the discipline to tolerate discomfort, the courage to declare something “good enough,” and the psychological insight to manage your own energy economy.
Empty space, drag to resize
Sources:
Recent psychological and management research on work stress, procrastination, and self-regulation. These studies identify fear, task aversiveness, perfectionism, overload and emotional states (anxiety, exhaustion, boredom) as key reasons incomplete tasks persist.
- Bravata, D. M., Watts, S. A., Keefer, A. L., Madhusudhan, D. K., Taylor, K. T., Clark, D. M., Nelson, R. S., Cokley, K. O., & Hagg, H. K. (2020). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1252–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05364-1 (PMC)
- Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 (annualreviews.org)
- Metin, U. B., Taris, T. W., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2016). Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006 (Utrecht University)
- Metin, U. B., Peeters, M. C. W., & Taris, T. W. (2018). Correlates of procrastination and performance at work: The role of having “good fit.” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 46(3), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2018.1470187 (PubMed)
- Morris, N. (2024) MeQ – The Practical Science of Self-Intelligence
- Morris, N. (2016). Procrastinate Now – Rethinking Time Management. Tellwell Talent. https://www.amazon.ca/Procrastinate-Now-Rethinking-Management-Morris-ebook/dp/B01M01BYWV
- Pychyl, T. A., & Sirois, F. M. (2016). Procrastination, emotion regulation, and well-being. In F. M. Sirois & T. A. Pychyl (Eds.), Procrastination, health, and well-being (pp. 163–188). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802862-9.00008-6 (ScienceDirect)
- Uhlig, L., Baumgartner, V., Prem, R., Siestrup, K., Korunka, C., & Kubicek, B. (2023). A field experiment on the effects of weekly planning behaviour on work engagement, unfinished tasks, rumination, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 96(3), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12430 (PubMed)
- van Hooft, E. A. J., & van Hooff, M. L. M. (2018). The state of boredom: Frustrating or depressing? Motivation and Emotion, 42, 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9710-6 (SpringerLink)
- Wiese, J., Buehler, R., & Griffin, D. (2016). Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007269 (Cambridge University Press & Assessment)
Who we are
This site is part of Denmor Concepts Inc. - a trusted provider of results-driven education and training since 2000.
Founded by internationally-recognized Certified Business Psychologist (ABP/UK) Nancy Morris, we deliver science-backed insights and practical tools that strengthen mental focus, business growth, and leadership so legal professionals and forward-thinking firms perform at their best.
Due to the nature of our live workshops, on-demand accredited content, and short-form programs, all registrations are final. We do not offer refunds or credits for any reason (unless previously agreed) including but not limited to scheduling conflicts, illness or dissatisfaction with the course/workshop/program content.
Founded by internationally-recognized Certified Business Psychologist (ABP/UK) Nancy Morris, we deliver science-backed insights and practical tools that strengthen mental focus, business growth, and leadership so legal professionals and forward-thinking firms perform at their best.
Due to the nature of our live workshops, on-demand accredited content, and short-form programs, all registrations are final. We do not offer refunds or credits for any reason (unless previously agreed) including but not limited to scheduling conflicts, illness or dissatisfaction with the course/workshop/program content.
Popular workshops, courses and featured programs are:
-
Rainmaker Habits (accredited)
-
Feeling Burned Out? (accredited)
-
Unseen Toll of Bias (accredited)
-
MeQ™ Daily
-
MeQ™ Journaling Tool
-
MeQ™ Essentials
-
Merit 5 Day Mini Course
Get in touch
-
Denmor Concepts Inc.
#335, 1826 Robertson Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 1B9 -
Nancy@NancyMorris.com
Copyright © 2025 Not a CPBAO registrant. Services are educational, not clinical.