A dialectic conversation begins with a thesis which triggers an antithesis which results in a synthesis. The bottom line of all this language is this –
Conflict within discussion is a good thing.
Actually, it is because of disagreement that ideas, opportunities and solutions advance.
An idea surfaces – the thesis. From there, usually someone opposes, argues or debates a point – the antithesis. As the discussion moves forward, a synthesis will come. (And that synthesis can form the basis of another thesis.)
Imagine your day filled with everyone simply agreeing with everything you say, nodding like bobbleheads. At first glance, you may think to yourself – ‘hey, it would be great if everyone had the same opinion as me’. But soon you would get bored. There would be little progress and even less wisdom.
Action – Next time someone disagrees with you, welcome the opportunity. It is a chance for both of you to learn.
In fact, it is the only way to grow.
Absolutely! The old saying “two heads are better than one” comes to mind. In my work, we almost always function this way – we have to, because one person does not have all the answers, even our manager (who encourages the ‘antithesis’). Our end result – synthesis – is always stronger for going through this process